Quest's art Reviews on Newgrounds

[Unnamed 4]

Pretty cool, a more interesting pattern other than just one corner to the other could be better.

Qw3rtyGMD responds:

I was tired

[Tracie]

Your art style is perfect for this character. Also, what happened to StormyDew?

wayyward responds:

Thank you so much!! And I’ve been wondering the same thing about Stormy. I really wish I knew. It seems like her account just disappeared, I guess she deactivated it but I don’t know why, I miss her

[Leo]

Really nice implementation of perspective and motion.

IGNITEDBOI responds:

Thank youu for the nicest compliment!, i am little by little trying to get better at perspective and so trying to improve my style as well too!.

[dfijgjdrjingiurd]

I love the emotion behind this.

sinnykitt responds:

thank you!<3

[Natasha Illustration]

Love all the little details on the shelf. These characters are begging to be animated, they feel so alive already.

MasterCreator03 responds:

Wow! Thank you so much. Its great to hear that my illustration skills are improving.

[Eldir Presents: The AI Debate part 2/2]

I don't think basic photoshopping of other people's work (including AI generations) is allowed on Newgrounds anyway. It has to mostly be your work. I agree that there can still be the same issues with copywright, but not necesarilly. Unlike photos, which can be licenced under creative commons or any other licence, nearly every AI model has been trained without the consent or permission from the original artists and photographers. If you generate something first, and then photoshop it, then you're just being uncreative twice. Using AI is also terrible for the environment, using up both energy and water as slop is generated on massive server farms. There really is no positive aspects of generative AI (except maybe with reasearchers). TLDR: Photoshopping other people's work is uncreative, photoshopping AI generations is even worse, and AI is just all-around bad.

12DAMDO responds:

this was not a pro-AI comic, it's more of a pro-conversation comic.. so while i appreciate hearing your side of the story for a second time (you already commented under part 1), i do hope you didn't at least miss the point
also, i hope you watched the video i sent you by Draw With Jazza (i think he has a very nuanced view on this topic)

[guys]

They are both beautiful. I love the attention to detail.

sinnykitt responds:

Thank you!!

[Fjord Stone]

I like the chaotic sketchy vibes this has. It feels like it would be messy and ill-defined, but it works really well to give things texture and personality.

BubbleNebulaArt responds:

Thank you, I've working on this sketchy style for a while while now, so I'm glad that it's paying off

[GodzillOctober Day 12 - Rodan]

Really pretty gradients.

YourGuyTheOTi responds:

Thanks!

[Eldir Presents: The AI Debate part 1/2]

David. Without a doubt.

You do realize that AI is different from copyrighted materials right? It goes deeper than that. AI was trained (illegally) on the backs of artists, musicians, and storytellers. It isn't magic. How would you feel if I downloaded all of your art and used it to train a stable diffusion lora model to spit out art that is styled exactly like yours (and then "photoshop it")? I'm not going to do that because I am a sane and rational individual, but do you see why people are uncomfortable with this, even if it's photoshopped afterwards? Please think about this.

12DAMDO responds:

hi, i recommend this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DK4HLexK8Y
the purpose of my comic was to start conversation, but i think this video did a better job at that, and i think both sides of the debate can learn from it